ArticleCancers2025
Novel CTC Detection Method in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Using High-Resolution Image Scanning.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAppropriate biomarkers are necessary for early diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In recent years, the clinical utility of circulating tumor cells (CTC) as biomarkers for various can-cers has been reported; however, their detection rate in PDAC remains low, and clinical evidence is not yet established. CTC detection methods with high reliability and per-formance are essential for clarifying the importance of CTC in patients with PDAC.
methodsA total of 5 mL peripheral blood samples were collected from 38 patients newly diagnosed with PDAC and 17 healthy controls. Negatively enriched cells were immunofluorescently stained with EpCAM-phycoerythrin and cell surface vi-mentin-fluorescein isothiocyanate (CSV). Images were automatically captured using an all-in-one fluorescence microscope. Cellular regions were detected from these images, and the average luminance of the cellular regions was calculated. A total of 9086 and 1071 cell images were obtained from patients with PDAC and healthy controls, respec-tively.
resultsIn the EpCAM assay, a threshold that included 95% of healthy individuals was optimal for distinguishing patients with PDAC from healthy controls, with a sensi-tivity, specificity, and area under the curve of 0.74, 0.76, and 0.84, respectively. At this threshold, the CTC-positivity rate in patients with PDAC was 76.3%. Conversely, the CSV assay failed to demonstrate a valid threshold to distinguish patients with PDAC from healthy controls. No significant differences were found between CTC and clini-copathological features among patients with PDAC.
conclusionsThe method using high-resolution image scanning has the potential to identify CTC with greater objectiv-ity by quantifying cell luminance values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.