ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Endoscopic Ultrasound in Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer: From Staging to Strategy-A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cervical Esophageal Characteristics in Smokers Versus Non-Smokers: An Ultrasonographic Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a major global health challenge due to its aggressive nature and frequent late-stage diagnosis. Accurate locoregional staging is critical for guiding appropriate therapy, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as the preferred modality for assessing tumor depth and regional lymph node involvement. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the role of EUS in the management of ESCC, from initial staging to post-treatment assessment. We discuss its strengths and limitations, particularly in differentiating early-stage disease and in restaging after neoadjuvant therapy. The importance of a multimodal approach-integrating EUS with computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and histologic sampling-is emphasized to improve diagnostic precision. We also explore emerging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced EUS, elastography, and novel therapeutic strategies including immune checkpoint inhibitors and endoscopic mucosal resurfacing. While EUS remains a cornerstone in the management of ESCC, ongoing innovation and integration with personalized medicine are expected to further enhance its clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.