ArticleGenes2025
Examining the Concordance of Detection of Hereditary Cancer Gene Variants Between Blood, Tumour, and Normal Tissue in Patients with High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAccess to genetic counselling and BRCA1/2 germline testing is standard of care for patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). While tumour testing reliably detects pathogenic variants in hereditary cancer genes, it cannot distinguish somatic from germline variants. Concurrent testing of non-cancerous (normal) tissue obtained during surgery may improve triage for germline testing and clinical genetics referral. This study evaluated the concordance of inherited variant detection among tumour, normal tissue, and blood to determine whether archived normal tissue can reliably identify germline pathogenic variants.
methodsPatients with HGSOC who had a pathogenic variant identified by targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) tumour testing and underwent germline hereditary cancer gene panel (HCP) testing between April 2019 and November 2020 were included. HCP testing was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded normal tissue from the original resection. Variant results were compared across tumour, normal tissue, and germline (blood) samples to determine concordance, false-negative, and false-positive rates.
resultsForty-one patients had confirmed tumour variants in BRCA1/2 or other HCP genes. Of these, 24 harboured a corresponding germline pathogenic variant. Archived normal tissue was available for 23 of these 24 cases, and all germline variants were detected in normal tissue, showing 100% concordance. Among the 17 patients without germline variants, all corresponding normal tissue samples were negative, also demonstrating 100% concordance. No false positives or negatives were identified.
conclusionsNGS testing of normal tissue at surgical resection reliably identifies germline pathogenic variants in patients with HGSOC. Incorporating this approach may help triage patients for clinical genetics assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.