ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Barriers to and Facilitators of Pediatric Palliative Care in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan: A Document Analysis.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pediatric Palliative Care: Communication, Decision-Making, Care, and Support Amid Complexity and Uncertainty.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough progress has been made, substantial barriers exist in the development and implementation of pediatric palliative care (PPC) in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Possible explanations include the idea that cultural taboos erect barriers that short-circuit PPC discussions among stakeholders, and secondly, regional guidelines intended to support PPC fail to do so effectively. Here, we aimed to identify and document the scope of barriers to and facilitators of PPC practices in these regions and to explore to what extent and how regional PPC guidelines address these barriers/facilitators.
methodsWe identified and compared two kinds of documents: (1) recent journal articles reporting on empirical studies of barriers to/facilitators of PPC practices in mainland China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan and (2) published PPC regional guidelines from the three regions. International and regional databases were searched to identify articles, along with PPC professional organizations in the three regions to identify PPC guidelines. Inductive content analysis was used for data analysis, synthesis, and document comparison.
resultsSeventeen relevant articles on PPC barriers/facilitators and 16 documents with PPC guidelines were identified. Barriers/facilitators were reported on three organizational levels: micro, meso, and macro levels. Micro refers to children and parents, meso to medical institutions and healthcare providers (HCPs), and macro to policy/guidelines and networks. Most barriers were addressed by PPC guidelines, and most facilitators were acknowledged and endorsed in the guidelines. For instance, HCPs reported that insufficient PPC-related knowledge among stakeholders was a barrier, while PPC guidelines provided detailed information to address this shortfall. Unaddressed barriers in the guidelines were also uncovered, such as the cultural taboo of discussing death, suggesting that HCPs often struggled to have effective PPC conversations with parents and the child.
conclusionsOur finding that PPC guidelines addressed most barriers/facilitators while HCPs still struggled with implementing PPC indicates that mature PPC guidelines are necessary but not sufficient for PPC practices to improve in these three regions. The wide availability of PPC guidelines and PPC education/training for HCPs and families needs to improve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.