Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41300297›Full record

ReviewBiology2025

Coevolution Dynamics of Beneficial and Pathogenic Microbes in Plant-Microbe Interactions.

Afeez Adesina Adedayo, Mary Tomi Olorunkosebi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Afeez Adesina AdedayoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5388-2877
Mary Tomi OlorunkosebiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intricate connections between plants and the microbial populations that surround them are crucial for plant development and resilience, but little is known about the evolutionary processes influencing these partnerships. Less is known about how pathogenic and beneficial microbes coevolve with their plant hosts over ecological and evolutionary timeframes, despite the fact that several studies identify rhizosphere and endophytic microbes that support nutrient acquisition, disease resistance, and stress tolerance. Using molecular, ecological, and evolutionary investigations from soil, rhizosphere, and endosphere habitats, this review summarizes current findings on microbial coevolution in plant-microbe systems. We look at the endosymbiotic processes that underlie the development of organelles, the mechanisms of mutualism and antagonism, and the eco-evolutionary feedbacks that affect plant health and agricultural output. The inadequate comprehension of intraspecific microbial diversity, the application of laboratory coevolution experiments to field settings, and the long-term effects of climate change on the evolutionary dynamics of plants and microbiomes are some of the major knowledge gaps. When pathogenic and beneficial microbes apply selective pressures to one another and their common host, coevolution takes place. This results in mutual genetic and physiological adaptations, such as modifications to host immunity, microbial virulence, or competitive tactics, which influence the way the two types interact over time. We conclude that understanding plants as holobiont-integrated units of hosts and their microbiomes offers fresh chances to develop microbiome-based approaches to sustainable agriculture, such as coevolutionary breeding programs, precision biofertilizers, and resilient cropping systems.

Indexed as

endophytesholobiontsmicrobial arm racerhizosphere microbiomessustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID41300297
PMCPMC12650590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.