ReviewBiology2025
Modeling Glioblastoma for Translation: Strengths and Pitfalls of Preclinical Studies.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Engineering of Aptamers for Glioblastoma Therapy: From Simple Antagonists to AI-Driven Approaches, a Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of Therapeutic Resistance and Recent Advances in Glioblastoma Treatment.Immunology and cell biology · 2026Review
- Overexpression of miR-219 as a potential therapeutic strategy of glioblastoma cells in vitro.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimized Wound Healing Assay to Study Extracellular Vesicle-Driven Glioblastoma Cell Migration.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Closing the loop on glioblastoma: A roadmap toward developing bioelectronics for continuous monitoring of tumor state.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GB) is an extremely aggressive tumor for which effective therapy is still in its infancy. Although several candidate therapeutics have been identified in functional preclinical assays, clinical trials have not supported their effectiveness in GB patients. The poor clinical efficacy of the treatments can be attributed to the insufficient mimicry of GB in patients by the preclinical models used. In this review article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the available GB preclinical models, which are classified according to their origin (animal or human), species, type and modeling strategy (two- or three-dimensional cell culture, in vivo grafting or in silico modeling). Moreover, the article compares developing cutting-edge technologies, including GB-derived organoids, bioprinting, microfluidic devices, and their multimodal integration in GB-on-chip systems, which aim to replicate the GB microenvironment with high precision. In silico and in vivo approaches are also reviewed, including zebrafish transplantation models. The costs, benefits, applications and clinical relevance of each model system and/or modeling strategy are discussed in detail and compared. We highlight that the most appropriate, or combination of, GB preclinical models must be selected (or even customized) based on the specific aims and constraints of each study. Finally, to improve the reliability and translational relevance of GB research, we propose a practical roadmap that addresses critical challenges in preclinical assay development, ranging from short-term adjustments to long-term strategic planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.