Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41300262›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Assessing the Relationship Between the Flicker Test and Cognitive Performance.

Natalia D Mankowska, Rita I Sharma, Anna B Marcinkowska, Jacek Kot, Pawel J Winklewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia D MankowskaApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-4226
Rita I SharmaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5975-0349
Anna B MarcinkowskaApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8331-208X
Jacek KotNational Centre for Hyperbaric Medicine, Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine in Gdynia, Medical University of Gdansk, 81-519 Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-8407
Pawel J WinklewskiDepartment of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-2163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An individual's ability to process flickering light is expressed by critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF), tested with the flicker test. CFFF is used to assess visual processing, arousal, and cognitive functioning, among other things, although it is unclear how it reflects these processes. Due to possible differences between CFFF values obtained in trials with increasing and decreasing frequency, it also remains questionable to use only averaged CFFF values in research. The main objective of the present study was to assess how CFFF is related to cognitive functions (attention, short-term and working memory, and executive functions), and psychomotor speed. The research objectives also included assessing the stability of CFFF and its variability with age and comparing CFFF between men and women. Thirty-six participants (17 women and 19 men) completed computerized cognitive tests (Simon and flanker tasks, the Corsi block-tapping task, and the digit span task) three times, along with the flicker test. We found that CFFF scores were stable across sessions but differed between fusion and flicker thresholds, with age significantly correlating only with the fusion frequency. Given that, we suggest that future studies analyze not only the averaged CFFF, but also examine flicker and fusion thresholds separately to better understand their distinct contributions. Our results also revealed generally weak correlations between CFFF and neuropsychological test scores, with significant associations found only in women, suggesting that CFFF may not be a reliable indicator of cognitive functioning.

Indexed as

attentionCFFFcognitive assessmentcritical flicker fusion frequencyflicker testmemoryreaction time

Identifiers

PMID41300262
PMCPMC12650153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.