ArticleBiology2025
Assessing the Relationship Between the Flicker Test and Cognitive Performance.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cognitive risk during underwater exposure: from environmental stressors to assessment and context-aware monitoring.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An individual's ability to process flickering light is expressed by critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF), tested with the flicker test. CFFF is used to assess visual processing, arousal, and cognitive functioning, among other things, although it is unclear how it reflects these processes. Due to possible differences between CFFF values obtained in trials with increasing and decreasing frequency, it also remains questionable to use only averaged CFFF values in research. The main objective of the present study was to assess how CFFF is related to cognitive functions (attention, short-term and working memory, and executive functions), and psychomotor speed. The research objectives also included assessing the stability of CFFF and its variability with age and comparing CFFF between men and women. Thirty-six participants (17 women and 19 men) completed computerized cognitive tests (Simon and flanker tasks, the Corsi block-tapping task, and the digit span task) three times, along with the flicker test. We found that CFFF scores were stable across sessions but differed between fusion and flicker thresholds, with age significantly correlating only with the fusion frequency. Given that, we suggest that future studies analyze not only the averaged CFFF, but also examine flicker and fusion thresholds separately to better understand their distinct contributions. Our results also revealed generally weak correlations between CFFF and neuropsychological test scores, with significant associations found only in women, suggesting that CFFF may not be a reliable indicator of cognitive functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.