ReviewBiology2025
Environmental DNA Metabarcoding in Marine Ecosystems: Global Advances, Methodological Challenges, and Applications in the MENA Region.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome analysis of Brevibacterium sanguinis AZMABM HM27: a bacterial isolate from the sea anemone Radianthus magnifica and exhibiting promising multi-therapeutic properties.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing the 12S rRNA reference library of South African chondrichthyans to aid in eDNA metabarcoding.BMC zoology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has transformed marine biodiversity monitoring by allowing non-invasive, cost-effective detection of species with high resolution across diverse marine habitats. A systematic literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Qatar University Library databases. Relevant peer-reviewed publications were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion criteria to ensure comprehensive coverage of studies. This review synthesizes advances in global and regional eDNA applications, emphasizing the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, which faces unique environmental extremes, high endemism, and significant data gaps. eDNA metabarcoding often outperforms traditional methods under comparable sampling effort to traditional surveys in detecting rare, cryptic, and invasive taxa, but technical challenges like incomplete reference databases, primer biases, PCR inhibitors, and inconsistent methodologies limit their effectiveness, particularly in understudied areas such as MENA. Recent developments, including multi-marker approaches, autonomous samplers, and next-generation sequencing, are enhancing detection precision and enabling broader, real-time monitoring. In the MENA region, early studies have revealed eDNA's potential for habitat distinction, biogeographic research, pollution assessment, and the early discovery of non-indigenous species, although progress is hindered by gaps in reference libraries, infrastructure, and regulation. This review underscores the urgent need for regional collaboration, standardized protocols, and capacity-building. By integrating eDNA with traditional methods and leveraging emerging technologies, the MENA region can establish itself as a leader in marine biomonitoring under extreme environmental conditions, providing actionable insights for conservation and sustainable management of its unique marine ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.