Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41300239›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Comment on Panuccio et al. Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.

Sarah J Wallace, Katerina Hilari, Klaus Willmes, Marcus Meinzer, Claudia Peñaloza, Lizet van Ewijk, Rebecca Palmer, Sally Zingelman, William D Hula, Caterina Breitenstein and 1 more

Abstract readComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurorehabilitation Clinical Pathways in Stroke: The Padova Model.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah J WallaceQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0600-9343
Katerina HilariSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, City St George's, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2091-4849
Klaus WillmesDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9012-0553
Marcus MeinzerDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Claudia PeñalozaDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1200-5936
Lizet van EwijkResearch Group Speech and Language Therapy, Research Center Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, 3584CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8916-8023
Rebecca PalmerSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Sally ZingelmanQueensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0599-5708
William D HulaGeriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-0753
Caterina BreitensteinDepartment of Neurology, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6408-873X
Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (CATs)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We write on behalf of the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists and in response to an article recently published in the journal

Identifiers

PMID41300239
PMCPMC12651624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.