Deciding When to Align: Computational and Neural Mechanisms of Goal-Directed Social Alignment.

Human behavior is shaped by a pervasive motive to align with others, manifesting across a wide range of tendencies-from motor synchrony and emotional contagion to convergence in beliefs and choices. Existing accounts explain how alignment arises through predictive coding and observation-execution mechanisms, but they do not address how it is regulated in a manner that considers when alignment is adaptive and with whom it should occur. We propose a goal-directed model of social alignment that integrates computational and neural levels of analysis, to enhance our understanding of alignment as a context-sensitive decision process rather than a reflexive social tendency. Computationally, alignment is formalized as a prediction-error minimization process over the gap between self and other, augmented by a meta-learning layer in which the learning rate is adaptively tuned according to the inferred value of aligning versus maintaining independence. Assessments of the traits and mental states of self and other serve as key inputs to this regulatory function. Neurally, higher-order representations of these inputs are carried by the mentalizing network (dmPFC, TPJ), which exerts top-down control through the executive control network (dlPFC, rIFG) to enhance or inhibit alignment tendencies generated by observation-execution (mirror) circuitry. By reframing alignment as a form of social decision-making under uncertainty, the model specifies both the computations and neural circuits that integrate contextual cues to arbitrate when and with whom to align. It yields testable predictions across developmental, comparative, cognitive, and neurophysiological domains, and provides a unified framework for understanding the adaptive functions of social alignment, such as strategic social learning, as well as its maladaptive outcomes, including groupthink and false information cascades.