Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41300091›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advances in Food Processing Techniques for Allergenicity Reduction and Allergen Identification.

Marta Wójcik, Krystian Marszałek, Edyta Juszczuk-Kubiak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta WójcikDepartment of Fruit and Vegetable Product Technology, Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology-State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland.
Krystian MarszałekDepartment of Fruit and Vegetable Product Technology, Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology-State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-0704
Edyta Juszczuk-KubiakDepartment of Biotechnology, Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology-State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5093-5320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food allergies represent a growing global public health concern, affecting individuals of all ages in developed and developing countries. Complete avoidance of allergenic foods remains challenging, underscoring the need for effective strategies to reduce food allergenicity. Consequently, there is increasing interest in techniques that lower the immunoreactivity of allergenic proteins in food. The use of processes such as thermal treatment, enzymatic treatment, or fermentation can lead to structural changes in proteins, limiting their ability to bind IgE antibodies. However, the effectiveness of these methods varies and depends on both the type of protein and the conditions of the process used. At the same time, it is crucial to select the appropriate method for determining protein immunoreactivity, as there is no single, universal measurement tool. Differences in sensitivity and detection range between methods, such as ELISA, Western blot, and LC-MS/MS, may affect the reproducibility of the results obtained. The development of a "hypoallergenic" product remains a major challenge, highlighting the need for an integrated approach combining a variety of technological strategies. The aim of this article is to review the available food processing methods that reduce protein allergenicity and to analyze the appropriate selection of analytical tools for their evaluation.

Indexed as

allergen detectionallergenic proteinsfood allergyfood processingfood safety

Identifiers

PMID41300091
PMCPMC12651889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.