ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Ingredient Substitution in Food Systems: A Review and Conceptual Framework for Sensory, Functional, Nutritional, and Cultural Optimization.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritizing Artificial Intelligence Opportunities for Food as Health in the U.S. Agrifood Value Chain.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Alternative Protein Design: Nutritional Constraints, Sensory Limits, and Computational Solutions.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Development of an AI-Driven Computational Framework for Integrated Dietary Pattern Assessment: A Simulation-Based Proof-of-Concept Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in bread making: Applications in quality control, formulation and sensory prediction.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- AI virtual streamers in sustainable food marketing: how expertise, interactivity, and anthropomorphism shape consumer acceptance of upcycled foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ingredient substitution has become a multidimensional challenge in modern food systems, where sensory authenticity, functional performance, nutritional equivalence, and cultural or regulatory compliance must be satisfied simultaneously. This review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can contribute to this problem by synthesizing current advances across four scientific domains relevant to substitution: flavor perception, matrix functionality, nutrient bioavailability, and socio-regulatory constraints. The review follows a narrative, domain-focused approach rather than a systematic or quantitative protocol, with literature selected from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to capture both foundational food science studies and emerging AI applications. A modular framework for AI-enabled ingredient substitution is proposed and structured around four domains: (1) flavor and aroma modeling, (2) functional property prediction, (3) nutritional profiling, and (4) constraint-based filtering. The framework brings together a range of AI techniques-including machine learning, graph neural networks, natural language processing, and multi-objective optimization-and connects them to domain-specific datasets such as volatile compound libraries, rheological measurements, dietary reference databases, and regulatory ontologies. The review identifies three major gaps limiting real-world deployment: the lack of multimodal datasets linking composition, perception, and processing; limited explainability of current AI models; and weak integration between computational outputs and regulatory or industrial workflows. Addressing these barriers will be essential for developing transparent, scalable, and context-aware substitution systems that align with future directions in sustainable and personalized food innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.