ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Household Food Waste Patterns Across Groups: A Clustering Analysis Based on Theory of Planned Behavior Constructs and Shopping Characteristics.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socio-demographic and economic factors associated with unhealthy food consumption among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: a nationwide cross-sectional study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs and shopping routines are strong predictors of food waste behavior, while socio-demographic factors show mixed and weaker associations. We analyzed survey data from a nationally representative sample of 1066 U.S. households, measuring self-reported food waste frequency across meals, food types, and disposal methods. We applied k-medoid clustering on 19 TPB constructs and 25 shopping characteristics to identify three distinct consumer segments. "Structured Planners" (Cluster 1) showed the most deliberate shopping habits and strongest engagement in food waste reduction. "Flexible Planners" (Cluster 2) shared similar waste outcomes but approached shopping with greater spontaneity, while "Younger Wasters" (Cluster 3) were younger, lower-income, and less educated, with casual shopping habits, lower ratings of TPB constructs, and the highest food waste frequency overall. These distinct behavioral profiles enable policymakers to directly identify and target specific demographic segments for tailored food waste interventions. Particularly, "Younger Wasters" reported a significantly higher food waste frequency at 6.7 times per week, while "Structured Planners" and "Flexible Planners" were statistically similar at approximately 4.6 and 4.4 times per week. Dinner is the meal resulting in the most food waste across all groups, and "Younger Wasters" reported the highest frequency of waste in protein, oil, and grain. Post-clustering ANOVA analysis tested the predictive power of TPB, shopping characteristics, and cluster membership on food waste frequency. Results show that "Younger Wasters", along with variables like attitude, store shopping frequency, and shopping behavior, are significantly positively associated with food waste frequency. This study demonstrates the potential of clustering analysis in exploring food waste determinants and suggests using clustered indices as proxies for respondents' overall traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.