ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cold-Pressed Walnut-Oil Adulteration with Edible Oils Detection Using Vis-NIR Spectroscopy.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Determination of Palmitic Acid Content in Edible Oils Using Vis-NIR Reflectance Spectroscopy and Deep Learning Models.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of Quality Distinctions of Pumpkin Seed Oil (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Turning Disposed into Disposable-Development of Single-Use Products from Underutilized Brewery Wastes.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy as a tool for detecting the adulteration of cold-pressed walnut oil and other edible oils (rapeseed, sunflower, and soybean oils) at varying percentages. The spectra were recorded between 200 and 1800 nm, but the analyses focused on 350-1650 nm due to high UV and NIR absorption. Color was determined in CIEL*a*b* coordinates to achieve the differences among the samples. The spectra were submitted to several pre-treatment (none, normalization, SNV, MSC, baseline/detrend, first/second derivative, and 1st-order smoothing) to improve the statistical model's parameters. The differentiation of the samples was carried out using an unsupervised method (principal component analysis-PCA) and two supervised methods (linear discriminant analysis-LDA and partial least squares linear discriminant analysis-PLS-DA). Partial least squares regression (PLS-R) was used for predicting the degree of adulteration. Separation between the authentic and adulterated samples was visible in the PCA scores plot, primarily along the spectral regions of 420-500 nm (pigment-related absorption band) and 1150-1450 nm (lipid-associated band). PLS-DA was superior to DA for the discrimination of authentic/adulterated samples, with baseline spectra of 350-1650 nm yielding a 100% overall accuracy and near-perfect accuracy with MSC (98.48%). PLS-R was able to predict the adulteration level, depending on the pre-treatment applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.