ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses of Fresh, Freeze-Dried, and Cooked Apples: As Single Food or Preload.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EEG-based hypoglycemia detection in Type 1 Diabetes: Proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of raw, cooking, and freeze-drying on the postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses and preloading effect of apples. Three fruit products containing 50 g available carbohydrates, including raw apple (RA), freeze-dried apple (FA), and cooked apple (CA), were tested in fourteen healthy subjects. The result showed that the FA elicited both the mildest glycemic and insulinemic responses in terms of early postprandial glucose rise, hypoglycemia risk, insulin peak, and insulin sensitivity among all samples. Compared with CA, the FA induced lower postprandial glycemic amplitude. Compared with its uncooked counterparts, the FA led to lower postprandial insulin excursion. When eaten as a preload prior (containing 15 g available carbohydrates) to a rice meal, all apple preload groups reduced the postprandial glycemic peak, compared with the water preload group. Apple preload enhanced insulin recruitment in the first 30 min after preloading but did not increase the total amount of postprandial insulin secretion. The FA had a higher retention of total phenolic compounds and higher viscosity of the digesta than the RA. This study showed that freeze-dried apples have a potential advantage in terms of glycemic and insulinemic properties. Further investigation on the micro-structure and the rheological properties of the digesta are needed to understand the disparity of glycemic properties between the freeze-dried fruits and the other fruit products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.