Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41300014›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Adaptive Identification of Food Sweetness Concentration: An Electroencephalogram Feature Classification Network Under Taste Stimulation.

He Wang, Hong Men, Yan Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

He WangSchool of Automation Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China.ORCID 0009-0009-3737-9003
Hong MenSchool of Automation Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0215-4399
Yan ShiSchool of Automation Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5722-8204

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32471150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting and identifying consumers' perception of food sweetness can help guide the optimization of food formulations. Electroencephalogram (EEG) detection can capture changes in brain electrical activity in response to different sweet taste stimuli. In this work, we employ EEG detection and propose an EEG Feature Calculation and Classification Network (EFCC-Net) to recognize taste EEG signals under different sweetness concentration stimuli. First, taste-related EEG data from a subject group under varying sweetness concentration stimuli are collected. Then, an EEG Feature Calculation Module (EFCM) is proposed, which utilizes convolutional kernels of different sizes to compute local features from both temporal and spatial dimensions of EEG data. A lightweight self-attention mechanism is employed to compute global features, and a multi-branch computation approach is adopted to enhance feature extraction capability. Next, based on EEG topographic maps, qualitative analysis is conducted to examine differences in brain region activation under varying taste concentrations. Finally, leveraging the proposed EFCM, the EFCC-Net is designed to classify EEG data corresponding to different sweetness levels. Through structural optimization, ablation experiments, and comparisons with state-of-the-art EEG classification methods, EFCC-Net achieves the best classification performance, with an accuracy of 96.57%, a precision of 96.58%, and a recall of 96.53%, while also demonstrating superior stability.

Indexed as

deep learningEEG detectionEEG feature calculation modulefood sweetness concentration

Identifiers

PMID41300014
PMCPMC12651536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.