Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299889›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

Ensemble transfer learning for classifying physical examinations in GP consultation: a multi-model approach to human-object and human-to-human activity recognition.

Moomna Waheed, Hao Xiong, Kate Tong, Annie Y S Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moomna WaheedCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Hao XiongCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Kate TongCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-8608-9654
Annie Y S LauCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Centre for Health Informatics, Macquarie UniversityCentres of Research Excellence in Digital Health APP1134919Connected Health 1170937NHMRCNSW Health Early-Mid CareerNSW Health Early-Mid Career Fellowship and the NHMRC Centres of Research Excellence in Digital Health 1170937NSW Health Early-Mid Career Fellowship and the NHMRC Centres of Research Excellence in Digital Health APP1134919Pro Vice-Chancellor's Research Excellence Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to automatically classify physical examinations performed during general practitioner (GP) consultations using a deep learning fusion model. The model distinguishes between two interaction types: Human-Object Activities (HOA), such as blood pressure measurement, and Human-Human Activities (HHA), such as gland palpation. MATERIAL AND

methodA multi-component ensemble transfer learning framework was developed that integrates spatial and temporal feature analysis. The model comprises: (1) a CNN-LSTM module for spatial feature extraction and sequential modelling, (2) an ensemble of EfficientNet-B7, DenseNet-121, and Inception-v3 to capture diverse spatial representations, and (3) a fusion module that concatenates outputs from both streams, refined by an attention mechanism to prioritise salient features. Transfer learning was applied to fine-tune pre-trained networks on GP consultation video data. Model performance was evaluated using five-fold stratified video-level cross-validation, reporting mean ± SD for precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, Cohen's κ, and PR-AUC.

resultsThe fusion model achieved robust overall performance, with a precision of 92.1 ± 1.4%, recall of 89.9 ± 1.8%, F1-score of 90.9 ± 1.5%, specificity of 93.1 ± 1.3%, Cohen's κ of 0.90 ± 0.02, and PR-AUC of 0.935 ± 0.02. It consistently outperformed ten state-of-the-art baselines, while ablation analysis showed F1-score improvements of 17% over CNN-LSTM and 16% over the ensemble model, confirming the benefit of combining spatial and temporal analysis.

conclusionThe proposed fusion framework accurately recognises physical examinations in GP consultations and supports future telehealth and diagnostic research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGeneral PracticePhysical ExaminationBlood Pressure DeterminationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPalpationReferral and ConsultationVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID41299889
PMCPMC12844571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.