ReviewThe Journal of international medical research2025
Pharmacokinetics of therapies approved for spinal muscular atrophy: A narrative review of current evidence.
Review in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing the Global Disparities in Access to Treatment in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Neuromuscular Disorders: Recent Advances and Open Challenges.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Long-term comparative analysis of AAV9-mediated gene replacement therapies for spinal muscular atrophy in mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy is a severe neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 gene, leading to progressive motor neuron degeneration. Over the past decade, disease-modifying therapies targeting the survival motor neuron pathway-nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam-have significantly transformed the clinical landscape of spinal muscular atrophy. Despite their common therapeutic goal of restoring functional survival motor neuron protein levels, these agents differ markedly in their molecular design, route of administration, pharmacokinetic behavior, and population-specific efficacy. This narrative review provides a comprehensive synthesis of pre- and post-approval pharmacokinetic data from pivotal trials, real-world studies, and population-based modeling. Nusinersen, an intrathecal antisense oligonucleotide, demonstrates prolonged cerebrospinal fluid exposure and slow systemic clearance. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, a single-dose gene therapy, shows sustained survival motor neuron expression mediated by adeno-associated virus 9 vector delivery and episomal persistence in nondividing neurons. Risdiplam, an orally administered survival motor neuron 2 splicing modifier, exhibits systemic bioavailability with reliable central nervous system penetration and predictable pharmacokinetics across age groups. Elimination of gene products and oligonucleotides is a multifaceted process involving enzymatic degradation, immune responses, and excretion through the kidneys or liver. We further discussed how interindividual variability, age, survival motor neuron 2 copy number, and immunological factors influence pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. Personalized treatment strategies for spinal muscular atrophy are increasingly being guided by advances in pharmacokinetic modeling. As the field evolves, biomarker-based monitoring and combination therapies are emerging as promising complementary approaches. With growing clinical experience and an expanding body of pharmacokinetic research on targeted therapies, there is strong potential to further refine treatment strategies-ultimately making spinal muscular atrophy care more effective, safer, and more accessible for patients worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.