ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
School eHealth education program Pakistan (eSHEPP): an exploratory qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives on design, barriers, and facilitators.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNoncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are a growing health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan. Adolescence is a critical period for shaping lifelong behaviors, yet school-based health education remains limited, and inconsistently implemented. Digital health interventions offer scalable opportunities, but their feasibility, sustainability, and cultural acceptability in LMIC school settings remain underexplored.
objectiveThis study examined barriers and facilitators to delivering the School eHealth Education Program Pakistan (eSHEPP) and explored stakeholder perceptions of its design, delivery, and content for adolescent NCD prevention.
methodsAn exploratory qualitative design was applied in public secondary and higher secondary schools using purposive sampling. Data were collected through four Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with students and teachers (N = 36) and 11 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with parents and administrators. KII and FGD guides were based on the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit framework. Transcripts were thematically analyzed in NVivo v14 using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach. Credibility was supported through intercoder reliability (κ = 0.71) and stakeholder validation.
resultsMajor barriers included infrastructure gaps such as unreliable internet, electricity shortages, and lack of multimedia resources. However, students' digital familiarity and widespread mobile access were strong facilitators. Parents, teachers, and administrators endorsed eSHEPP, noting students' enthusiasm and the spillover of health knowledge to families. Stakeholders recommended a bilingual (Urdu/English), offline-accessible app with intuitive navigation, privacy safeguards, and interactive tools such as quizzes and rewards. Short Urdu videos with English subtitles, relatable scenarios, and student involvement were considered most engaging. Cultural sensitivities around mental health, gender norms, and substance use require careful framing. Sustainability was viewed as dependent on curriculum integration, teacher training, and institutional support.
conclusionseSHEPP shows strong potential as a culturally sensitive, scalable, and pedagogically sound model for adolescent health promotion in LMIC schools. Addressing infrastructural gaps, ensuring policy integration, and promoting digital equity will be critical for long-term impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.