ArticleBMC psychology2025
Digital stress and problematic social media use among college students: exploring dual emotional pathways and the moderating role of cognitive reappraisal.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social media use duration and epigenetic aging among U.S. adults in the MIDUS refresher study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- From Binge Scrolling to Problematic Technology Use: Fear of Missing Out as a Self-Regulatory Mediator.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Smartphone addiction, emotional coping strategies, and mental health symptoms in Chinese university students: a gender-based analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Personality traits and psychological distress in Chinese adolescents: the mediating roles of anxiety and depression.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital stress has emerged as a significant form of psychological strain in online environments and is closely associated with problematic social media use (PSMU). However, the emotional and cognitive processes underlying this relationship remain unclear. Guided by the stress-coping framework and the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model, the present study examined whether anxiety and depression mediate the association between digital stress and PSMU, and whether cognitive reappraisal moderates these indirect effects. A total of 2,103 Chinese university students (1,035 males; mean age = 20.37 years, SD = 1.26) completed self-report measures of digital stress, anxiety, depression, cognitive reappraisal, and PSMU. Structural equation modeling and latent moderated structural equation analyses were conducted to test the proposed model. Results indicated that higher levels of digital stress were associated with greater PSMU, both directly and indirectly through anxiety and depression. Moreover, cognitive reappraisal attenuated the strength of these associations, suggesting a moderating role in the relationship between digital stress and emotional responses. These findings support a dual emotional pathway framework, indicating that digital stress may be linked to problematic social media engagement through high-arousal (anxiety-related) and low-arousal (depression-related) emotional processes. The results provide empirical support for extending emotion regulation models to digital contexts and underscore the importance of strengthening cognitive reappraisal skills to promote healthier social media engagement among university students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.