ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Investigation of Cryptosporidium infection in a broad range of hosts in northern China.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Characterization and Zoonotic Potential ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Molecular detection and phylogeny ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCryptosporidium infection occurs in humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. To date, at least 49 species and 120 genotypes have been identified. Hitherto, molecular identification of Cryptosporidium species in wildlife has seldom been reported in China.
methodsDuring 2014-2025, a total of 1855 small intestinal or fecal specimens were collected from 1500 mammals, 121 reptiles, and 234 birds in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XUAR) and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR), northern China. The identification of each animal species was based on morphological characteristics and mitochondrial gene amplification. Detection of Cryptosporidium species was performed by amplifying part of the small subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. The 60 kDa glycoprotein (GP60) gene was used to confirm their species and subtypes.
resultsThe samples were collected from 39 mammalian, 6 reptilian, and 30 avian species. In these samples, the average rate of infection with Cryptosporidium species was 8.09% (150/1855). In total, 18 known Cryptosporidium species and genotypes were identified, including Cryptosporidium hominis, Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, Cryptosporidium muris, Cryptosporidium canis, Cryptosporidium felis, Cryptosporidium equi, Cryptosporidium proventriculi, Cryptosporidium ryanae, Cryptosporidium rubeyi, chipmunk genotype V, vole genotype III, vole genotype V, muskrat genotype I, bat genotype IV, yak genotype, deer genotype, goose genotype I, and one unnamed Cryptosporidium sp. In addition, a novel genotype, here designated as Cryptosporidium Mongolian pika genotype, was identified in the Mongolian pika (Ochotona pallasi).
conclusionsInvestigation of Cryptosporidium infection was carried out by screening 75 animal species. Overall, 19 Cryptosporidium species and genotypes were detected, including a novel genotype in Mongolian pika and first-time diagnosis of this infection in several rodent species (e.g., red-cheeked ground squirrels, great gerbils, northern mole voles, and Libyan jirds).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.