ArticleBMC psychology2025
Integrating job design and cognitive-emotional processes using latent network analysis: associations with performance and emotional well-being in navy personnel.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTheoretical developments underscore the need to expand beyond traditionally explored job design features to understand the employee experience, including non-work resources and demands and individual-level cognitive-emotional processes. Such complexity requires analytical methods capable of modeling multivariate and interrelated constructs. This study contributes to this effort by examining the experiences of Royal Australian Navy personnel through a multidimensional lens, modeling the interplay between demands, resources, and cognitive-emotional processes. Using novel analytical methods, we provide a foundation for exploring complex interactions between demands, resources, and cognitive-emotional processes on diverse employee outcomes.
methodsUsing large-scale cross-sectional data from 558 navy personnel (75.8% male; M
resultsSeveral demands and resources could be simplified into fewer categories by their source (e.g., home-life) and broader job design concepts (e.g., interpersonal demands, meaningful work). Findings reveal that certain demands, like job overload and complexity, are associated with specific outcomes such as fatigue and psychological distress. Similarly, resources like meaningful work were associated specifically with motivation-related outcomes. Certain personal resources, such as empowerment beliefs, were found to be associated with a range of outcomes, including mental health and performance. Cognitive-emotional processes also showed varied associations. Challenge appraisals were positively associated with resource perception and motivation, while threat/hindrance appraisals were linked to fatigue and distress.
conclusionsFindings underscore the value of multivariate approaches to capture the nuanced effects of job design elements and cognitive-emotional processes on diverse employee outcomes. This approach provides a flexible framework that can be adapted to other organizational contexts, helping inform targeted future longitudinal research to advise intervention targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.