ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic tracheal carina resection and reconstruction under spontaneous-ventilation anesthesia with a single-lumen endotracheal tube: case report and literature review.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRobot-assisted thoracoscopic carina resection and reconstruction using non-intubated laryngeal mask airway with spontaneous ventilation has been reported. However, no cases have been described using a single-lumen endotracheal tube under spontaneous-ventilation anesthesia. We report a case of a patient who developed carinal malignancy two years after right middle and lower lobectomy for lung cancer. He underwent robot-assisted carina resection and reconstruction under spontaneous-ventilation anesthesia via single-lumen endotracheal intubation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old male presented with a malignant tracheal carina tumor, complaining of bloody sputum and progressive dyspnea. Chest computed tomography (CT) and bronchoscopic biopsy confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. The patient had undergone right middle and lower lobectomy for squamous cell carcinoma (pT2bN0M0) two years prior. Current diagnosis was local recurrence with 90% carinal obstruction. After two cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, his symptoms resolved, and chest CT indicated near-complete remission (cCR). One month post-treatment, he underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic carina resection under spontaneous-ventilation anesthesia with single-lumen intubation. After anesthesia induction, surface infiltration anesthesia was performed on the glottis, trachea, carina, and main bronchus under the guidance of fiberbronchoscope, and a 7.0# single-lumen tube was placed. Regional block was performed on the incision site, vagus nerve, and intercostal nerves, followed by lidocaine spray on the lung surface. Spontaneous breathing was maintained using synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support ventilation (P-SIMV) followed by spontaneous mode. During carinal resection, a suction tube was inserted into the left main bronchus for oxygen insufflation. The procedure was completed with stable spontaneous ventilation and no air leak. The patient was extubated immediately post-operation, monitored briefly in the ICU, and transferred to the ward. This approach yielded excellent clinical outcomes.
conclusionSingle-lumen endotracheal intubation with preserved spontaneous-ventilation anesthesia for robot-assisted tracheal carina resection and reconstruction is safe and feasible. Compared with laryngeal mask spontaneous-ventilation anesthesia, this method has a wider range of applications among patients and is worthy of promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.