Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299727›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Functional recovery after laminoplasty versus staged anterior-posterior fusion for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Jae-Won Shin, Kyung-Soo Suk, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon, Si-Young Park, Byung-Ho Lee, Ji-Won Kwon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jae-Won ShinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.
Kyung-Soo SukDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea. sks111@yuhs.ac.
Hak-Sun KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.
Seong-Hwan MoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.
Si-Young ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.
Byung-Ho LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.
Ji-Won KwonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOssification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) causes progressive narrowing of the cervical canal and neurological deficits. Cervical laminoplasty (LP) and staged anterior-posterior fusion (APF) are widely used, but their comparative outcomes remain controversial. This study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of LP and APF for multilevel OPLL, with analysis according to OPLL subtype.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 217 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent LP (n = 135) or APF (n = 82) between 2014 and 2023. All patients had ≥ 3 operated levels and ≥ 1-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and subjective improvement rate (IR). Radiographic outcomes included C2-7 lordosis and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Between-group comparisons and longitudinal analyses were performed using t-tests, chi-square tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA.

resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Both LP and APF significantly improved neck and arm pain and JOA scores, with no group difference at 2 years. APF achieved greater correction of sagittal alignment, with larger improvements in C2-7 lordosis across all OPLL types (p < 0.001). However, APF patients had consistently higher NDI scores during early follow-up (p < 0.001), particularly in domains requiring cervical motion (personal care, lifting, work, driving). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with segmental-type OPLL experienced the greatest postoperative disability after fusion due to higher preoperative motion. These differences gradually decreased by 2 years, indicating functional adaptation. Although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0719), there was a trend toward higher IR in the APF group.

conclusionBoth LP and APF provided significant neurological recovery and pain relief in multilevel OPLL. APF yielded superior sagittal alignment but was associated with higher early postoperative disability, most pronounced in segmental-type OPLL. Differences diminished by the second postoperative year, suggesting patient adaptation. Surgical decision-making should consider OPLL subtype, preoperative mobility, and the trade-off between motion preservation and alignment correction.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeLaminoplastyOssification of Posterior Longitudinal LigamentRecovery of FunctionSpinal FusionAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCervical laminoplastyClinical outcomesNeck disability indexOssification of the posterior longitudinal ligamentPosterior cervical laminectomy and fusionSpinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID41299727
PMCPMC12751572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.