ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Unfolding the risk: a pilot study of airborne contamination in the operating room during total joint arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs known microbial reservoirs, hospital linens thrown in the operating room (OR) can impact sterility in total joint arthroplasty, where a reduced inoculum may result in periprosthetic joint infection. Herein, we examine the effects of hospital blankets dropped or thrown in the OR on airborne bioburden and contamination.
methodsA standardized, staged pilot study was developed employing different blanket handling practices in the OR. Airborne bioburden was compared between each of these common scenarios. Settling plates (n = 48) at varying distances from the disturbances were used to detect aerosolized organisms. Test conditions were conducted in the morning and afternoon to assess temporal changes in microbial flora.
resultsOf the 17 (35.4%) microorganism-positive plates, 7 (41.2%) were observed on control and 10 (58.8%) on days with dropped or thrown blankets. Positions near the airflow disturbance were 3× more likely to become contaminated compared to far positions (p = 0.03). Blankets dropped and thrown resulted in 18% more microorganisms compared to control (p = 0.59). Temporally, 58.8% (10/17) of the positive plates were observed following afternoon cases (p = 0.59). All microorganisms were gram positive, of which 93.3% were human colonizers, with Staphylococcus spp. being most common.
conclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that closer proximity to airflow disruptions negatively impacts sterility, while later time of day and dropped or thrown objects may contribute to contamination. The presented methodologies provide guidance for future studies, and the findings can help curtail OR practices by offering insights into the effects of airflow disruptions beyond the sterile field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.