ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2025
Understanding the complexity of surgical decision-making for individuals with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A qualitative study.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the factors influencing surgical decisions specific to symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (SLSS) can help healthcare providers support patients, set expectations and improve health literacy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the experiences and perspectives of Canadian patients who choose to undergo surgery for SLSS.
methodsWe used qualitative interpretive phenomenology to understand the surgical decision-making process from individuals with lived experience of SLSS. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews that lasted between 30 and 90 min. Inclusion criteria were individuals 55 or older, diagnosed with SLSS, scheduled for or have undergone lumbar spine surgery, and able to speak English. Participants were recruited between October 2019 and September 2021.
resultsA total of 32 participants (Men: n = 18; Women: n = 14) were included in this study. Among those participants, 15 were interviewed preoperatively and 17 postoperatively, and all were over 55 years. We identified 5 themes that were woven through the decision-making of respondents, beginning with the experience with healthcare systems and building outwards to the broader social context: (1) Previous experience with non-surgical management, (2) Worrisome symptoms impacting functionality, (3) Perception of surgery as a final course of action, (4) Post-surgical hopes/expectations (i.e., hope that they will be pain-free after surgery), and (5) Having a social support network (i.e., advice and support from family/friends).
conclusionSeveral experiences may influence an individual's decision to undergo spine surgery, highlighting the importance of integrating a biopsychosocial model in managing SLSS. For chiropractors and manual therapists, these indicators are particularly important, as they often represent a first point of contact for patients with SLSS. Clinicians must maintainperson-centric communication to help patients understand their condition and the clinical treatment pathway for SLSS and develop post-surgical expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.