Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299644›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Leguminous and gramineous plant silages display unique characteristics of bacterial community ecology.

Mao Li, Shuo Wu, Xuejuan Zi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Homofermentative and HeterofermentativeAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mao Li *Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Trees and Ornamental Plants, Key Laboratory of Germplasm Resources of Tropical Special Ornamental Plants of Hainan Province, School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Danzhou, 571737, Hainan, China. limaohn@163.com.
Shuo Wu *Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Trees and Ornamental Plants, Key Laboratory of Germplasm Resources of Tropical Special Ornamental Plants of Hainan Province, School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Danzhou, 571737, Hainan, China.
Xuejuan ZiKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Trees and Ornamental Plants, Key Laboratory of Germplasm Resources of Tropical Special Ornamental Plants of Hainan Province, School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Danzhou, 571737, Hainan, China. zixuejuan@163.com.

Funding

Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences 1630032022011the Key research and development projects of Hainan province HAIKOU2023-050the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32260350the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32471782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilage is the most important part of a ruminant diet and is also a renewable feedstock. Leguminous and gramineous plants are the main materials used to make silage. However, the general characteristics of silage fermentation and the mechanisms of microbial processes of Leguminosae and Gramineae have yet to be clarified. Therefore, we examined which of the following contribute to differences in silage quality between leguminous (3 genera, 29 varieties) and gramineous (4 genera, 23 varieties) plants: microbial diversity, composition, functional profile, assembly process, or molecular ecological network.

resultsDiminished concentrations of propionic acid and butyric acid indicated that Leguminosae created silage of a superior quality compared to gramineous silage, which is further supported by the elevated V-score value. The α- and β-diversity indices showed obvious differentiation in bacteria diversity patterns between the gramineous and leguminous plant silages. The community compositions differed significantly as well. Pseudomonas dominated in gramineous silage, and Enterobacteriaceae (UG) and Lactobacillus dominated in leguminous silage. Meanwhile, the enriched Enterobacteriaceae (UG) and Lactobacillus, as well as the biomarker taxa Janthinobacterium and Pseudomonas, were designated critical silage microorganisms. In addition, the close correlation of bacterial and fermentation parameters revealed that silage quality is highly influenced by microbial composition. Additionally, leguminous and gramineous silages differed significantly in their microbial functional profiles, with many pathways significantly enriched in the gramineous silage, including biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites. Furthermore, the assembly mechanisms of the gramineous and leguminous silage microbial communities were determined by both stochastic and deterministic processes, with dispersal limitation being more influential than homogeneous selection. Moreover, the two bacterial co-occurrence networks were mainly cooperative, though the gramineous silage network was tighter and more complex than the leguminous silage network. Network module analysis showed that the diversity of modules and the bacterial composition of the largest module clearly differed between the gramineous and leguminous silage microbes. Finally, that leguminous silage had a noticeably higher robustness and an excellent natural connectivity indicates it had the more stable microbial network of the two.

conclusionsThis study revealed the differences between gramineous and leguminous plant silages in terms of fermentation quality, bacterial diversity, composition, functional profile, assembly mechanism and co-occurrence network. This outcome deepens our understanding of silage microbial processes across different plant families, and also provides a scientific basis from which to develop a protocol for the precise regulation of silage quality.

Indexed as

Assembly processesBacterial communityCo-occurrence networkFunctional profilesSilage

Identifiers

PMID41299644
PMCPMC12659566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.