ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2025
Impact of spatial accessibility to primary care physicians on health care outcomes and costs.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study is the first in Taiwan to apply the enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method to evaluate the spatial accessibility of primary care. Traditional physician-to-population ratios by administrative region overlook cross-boundary healthcare-seeking and travel distance barriers. This study accounts for these limitations and further examines the impact of accessibility on healthcare utilization and outcomes.
methodsWe used national health insurance claims, physician registry data, and GIS-based road networks to measure accessibility with the E2SFCA method, defining it as the number of primary care physicians per 10,000 residents within a 30-minute travel time. A retrospective cohort of 2 million adults was analyzed. Generalized estimating equations with appropriate regression models assessed associations between accessibility and healthcare utilization, expenditures, avoidable emergency department (ED), and avoidable hospitalizations.
resultsSpatial analysis identified 15 townships (114,915 residents, 0.49%) with no primary care physicians and another 15 townships (114,430 residents, 0.49%) with low accessibility. These underserved areas were concentrated in central and eastern Taiwan, whereas metropolitan regions had sufficient resources. Higher accessibility was significantly associated with fewer ED visits (ratio = 0.994; 95% CI: 0.990-0.997, P< 0.001), ED expenditures (ratio = 0.993; 95% CI: 0.989-0.997, P< 0.001), the odds of avoidable ED visits (odds ratio = 0.993; 95% CI: 0.988-0.998, P = 0.005), and the number of avoidable ED visits (ratio = 0.993; 95% CI: 0.988-0.998, P = 0.004). Accessibility also reduced the odds of avoidable hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.995; 95% CI: 0.990-0.999, P = 0.017).
conclusionGreater spatial accessibility to primary care was linked to reductions in ED visits, ED costs, avoidable ED use, and avoidable hospitalization. The E2SFCA method provides a more accurate tool for identifying underserved regions and can inform equitable allocation of healthcare resources. Telemedicine and mobile services should be expanded to address shortages in remote areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.