ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Navigating crisis: a qualitative exploration of medical social workers' responses to ethical issues during COVID-19.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical social workers' (MedSWs) roles and responsibilities expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic. They experienced larger caseloads, restrictive protocols, new policies, and work outside of their professional scope, despite limited access to resources, support, or hazard compensation. As a result, MedSWs faced complex ethical situations, which they had to address in accordance with the profession's guiding principles.
methodsWe conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 54 MedSWs about their professional experiences during the pandemic and used the National Association of Social Worker's Code of Ethics (service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence) as a deductive coding guide to describe MedSWs' navigation of and responsiveness to ethical situations across healthcare settings. We defined ethical situations as threats to values and ethical actions as attempts to resolve the threat in a way that aligns with professional standards. Our methodology was informed and documented via the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
resultsFrom MedSWs' interviews, we identified six major ethical situations that aligned with the six values and ethical principles in the Code: inadequate addressing of patients' social determinants of health by healthcare institutions (service), social injustices negatively impacting patients' and providers' healthcare experiences (social justice), de-prioritization of patients' wishes in high stakes situations (dignity and worth of the person), social isolation and related distress resulting from social distancing policies (importance of human relationships), encroachment on social workers' scope of practice boundaries (integrity), and lack of preparedness among social workers for emergency COVID-19 situations (competence). We also identified several ethical actions, aligning with the six ethical principles, that MedSWs took to address these situations.
conclusionThe ethical situations and actions that MedSWs discussed in this qualitative study align closely with the experiences of other healthcare workers during the pandemic. Despite uncertain situations, MedSWs relied on their innate understanding of social work principles to guide ad hoc decision-making. Results from this analysis indicate the need for more robust administrative and institutional support structures that would allow MedSWs to practice self-care, maintain their scope of practice boundaries, and access additional emergency preparedness training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.