Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299614›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Bridging the diagnostic gap: diagnostic capacity and pediatric quality of care in LMICs.

Dan Wang, Zhaoyu Li, Mengyao Li, Zhongliang Zhou, Wenhua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dan WangSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhaoyu LiSchool of Pharmaceutical Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Mengyao LiSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhongliang ZhouSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. zzliang1981@163.com.
Wenhua WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. wenhua.wang@mail.mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild mortality remains a major health burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where adherence to pediatric clinical guidelines is often suboptimal. Diagnostic capacity, the availability of essential laboratory and imaging tests, is a key structural input for delivering high-quality pediatric care, yet its relationship with quality of care has received limited empirical attention. This study examines the association between diagnostic capacity and adherence to evidence-based pediatric care guidelines across eight LMICs.

methodsWe analyzed nationally representative Service Provision Assessment (SPA) data from 5311 health facilities across eight LMICs (Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Haiti, Malawi, Nepal, Senegal, and Tanzania) collected between 2014 and 2022. Quality of care was assessed using a 10-item adherence index derived from direct observations of outpatient consultations, aligned with the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) protocol. Diagnostic capacity was measured using a 16-item index reflecting the availability of essential laboratory and imaging tests recommended in the WHO Essential Diagnostics List. Associations between diagnostic capacity and adherence to clinical guidelines were examined using multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear models, adjusting for facility-, provider-, and patient-level covariates.

resultsDiagnostic capacity varied substantially across countries and facility levels. Among primary care facilities, median diagnostic availability ranged from 20.1% in Malawi to 72.4% in Senegal; among hospitals, from 64.7% in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to 88.5% in Ethiopia. On a 10-point scale, pediatric care quality scores were lowest in Afghanistan (3.45) and highest in DR Congo (4.89). Higher diagnostic capacity was significantly associated with greater adherence to pediatric clinical guidelines (adjusted log-odds β = 0.138; 95% CI: 0.061-0.216; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses using alternative outcome definitions, exposure measures, subgroup classifications, and model specifications yielded consistent results.

conclusionsThis multi-country observational study identifies a positive association between diagnostic readiness and the quality of pediatric care in LMICs. These findings suggest that diagnostic capacity may serve as an enabling structural condition for delivering higher-quality pediatric care in LMICs, reinforcing the role of diagnostics within health system strengthening strategies.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGuideline AdherencePediatricsQuality of Health CareChildChild, PreschoolDemocratic Republic of the CongoEthiopiaFemaleHaitiHumansInfantMalawiMaleNepalDiagnostic capacityLow-resource settingsPediatric consultationsQuality of careWHO essential diagnostics list

Identifiers

PMID41299614
PMCPMC12750688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.