Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299612›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Patient safety culture in home care and its related factors and outcomes: a scoping review.

Tania Martins, David Bellagamba, Michael Simon, Julie Bucher Andary, Franziska Zúñiga

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tania MartinsDepartment of Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel, CH- 4056, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-4558
David BellagambaAssociation vaudoise d'aide et de soins à domicile, Avenue de Rhodanie 60, Lausanne, CH-1014, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-2916
Michael SimonDepartment of Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel, CH- 4056, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-7219
Julie Bucher AndaryAssociation vaudoise d'aide et de soins à domicile, Avenue de Rhodanie 60, Lausanne, CH-1014, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6809-1987
Franziska ZúñigaDepartment of Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel, CH- 4056, Switzerland. franziska.zuniga@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-4903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety culture is crucial to ensuring the quality and safety of healthcare. Assessing safety culture raises awareness of patient safety, identifies areas for improvement, and supports tracking changes over time. Given the increasing growth of home care, the complexity of care, and its unique characteristics, understanding safety culture in home care is essential to informing practice and guiding further research. We therefore aimed to identify instruments used to measure patient safety culture in home care, including its associated factors and outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO/Ovid, EMBASE/Ovid, and Web of Science and then a citation tracking in March 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the records for eligibility criteria. We included studies that measured patient safety culture from the perspective of healthcare professionals working in home care. The included studies were narratively summarized, and the findings are presented through descriptive texts and tables.

resultsThe screening of 1922 articles and citation tracking resulted in 13 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies employed self-reported questionnaires and one used interviews. The most frequently used questionnaires were adaptations of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture and Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Commonly assessed dimensions included teamwork, communication, management, and organizational learning, whereas job satisfaction and stress recognition were less frequently assessed. The studies examined the association of both individual (e.g., age, work experience) and work-related factors (e.g., weekly working hours, transformational leadership) with safety culture. The outcomes analyzed included person-centered care, the overall perceptions of patient safety, and the global reporting of patient safety events.

conclusionsDifferent instruments have been used to measure safety culture in home care, but none of them have been specifically developed for home care, and there is no agreement on which dimensions to include. Evidence on the associated factors and outcomes is scarce and inconclusive. Further research is needed to understand the concept of safety culture, including associated factors and outcomes. Applying mixed-methods and longitudinal study designs could provide a more comprehensive understanding of safety culture and support evaluating and developing strategies to improve it in home care. REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10779093 .

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesOrganizational CulturePatient SafetySafety ManagementAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansHealth personnelHome care agenciesPatient safetySafety climateSafety cultureScoping reviewSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41299612
PMCPMC12659234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.