ArticleBMC health services research2025
Patient experience and satisfaction with chiropractic care: a national survey.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient experience and satisfaction are important to stakeholders in the healthcare system, including payers, providers and patients. This study explores the patient experience and satisfaction with chiropractic care in Denmark including how aspects of patient experience and patient characteristics influence overall satisfaction.
methodsA national survey was conducted over a two-week period in January 2023, targeting patients in all chiropractic clinics in Denmark. Clinics were asked to invite all patients to participate. Enrolled participants completed an electronic survey, containing 28 items on patient experience and satisfaction (5-point Likert scale). Associations of aspects of patient experience and patient characteristics with overall satisfaction were analysed with ordinal regression. Variation across clinics was analysed by forest plots and random effect models.
resultsOf the 250 clinics invited, 228 clinics (91%) recruited 27,577 patients for the survey (invitation rate of 53%). Of these, 17,974 (65%) were included in the final analysis. Patients reported ‘very high’ or ‘high’ degree of overall satisfaction with care (97%). Overall satisfaction was associated with personal experiences involving the chiropractor, particularly in the areas of examination and communication, patient involvement and information, and perceived effectiveness and reassurance. Lower satisfaction was linked to experiences involving delays, unexpected adverse events, and the process of collaboration with other health care professionals. Higher satisfaction was reported among women, patients under 30 years, and those with prior chiropractic care. Variation in overall satisfaction and patient experiences could not be fully explained by differences in known patient characteristics.
conclusionWhile patients generally reported very high satisfaction with chiropractic care in Denmark, certain experiences and patient characteristics influenced this perception. Chiropractors should continue to prioritise quality interactions, personalised care, clear communication about risks of adverse events, and effective collaboration with other health care professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.