SynthesisBMC medical education2025
Pre-residency research productivity and its impact on admission to top-tier U.S. residency programs: a meta-analysis across specialties in surgical education.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPre-residency research productivity is widely regarded as a critical factor for medical students aspiring to competitive residency programs. However, its specific impact on admission to top-tier programs remains uncertain.
methodsA meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between pre-residency research productivity-including total publications, first-author publications, H-index, and specialty-specific output-and admission into high-reputation or high-research ranking residency programs. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases (up to May 2025) identified eight studies involving 3,477 U.S. medical students across seven specialties.
resultsTotal publication volume (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.21-2.74, p < 0.01) and H-index (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.57-2.37, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with admission into high-reputation programs. Similar trends were observed for high research ranking programs, with total publications (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.42-2.36, p < 0.001) and H-index (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.15-3.20, p = 0.01) showing robust correlations. In contrast, first-author publications demonstrated non-significant associations with both reputation (OR = 4.83, 95% CI: 0.37-63.26, p = 0.23) and research rankings (OR = 4.27, 95% CI: 0.74-24.51, p = 0.10).
conclusionPre-residency research productivity may confer a measurable advantage for admission into top-tier U.S. residency programs. These findings underscore the strategic value of sustained and impactful scholarly contributions, while challenging the traditional emphasis on first-author publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.