ReviewBMC medical education2025
A research roadmap for AI opportunities in student assessment for medical education.
Review in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence readiness in Pakistan's medical and dental education: training-phase decline, a knowledge-practice paradox, and the role of digital determinants of health.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Mapping the research landscape of virtual reality and artificial intelligence in medical education evaluation: A bibliometric analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- The FUSION Model: Smart Integration of Tradition and Innovation in Medical Education.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026Article
- Construction of a faculty competency model for medical simulation education integrated with GenAI: a multi-method quantitative study based on the perspective of medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Formative Assessment in Clinical Education: From Algorithms to Agency.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- A Conceptual Model for Embedding Automated Assessments in Graduate Medical Education.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical education is rapidly transforming assessment practices, offering unprecedented opportunities to enhance student evaluation, feedback, and learning pathways. However, despite the potential, a comprehensive understanding of these opportunities and their interdependencies has been lacking. This study provides a critical review of the literature on AI's role in medical education assessment, categorising 22 identified opportunities into seven major "mega-opportunities" that address various aspects of student assessment. Through the application of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM), the cause-effect interdependencies among these mega-opportunities were explored, revealing a complex web of relationships that guide their effective implementation. The findings highlight the central role of "Automated Feedback and Evaluation" and "Data-Driven Analytics and Curriculum Improvement" as foundational drivers, with far-reaching impacts on other areas like "Simulation-Based Assessment" and "Longitudinal Assessment and Development." This paper culminates in the proposal of aresearch roadmap that highlights the priority of addressing different mega-opportunities in AI and assessment, offering practical guidelines for medical researchers, educators, institutions, and policymakers to adopt AI-driven assessment strategies. Future research avenues are identified to explore the real-world application and impact of these AI-driven innovations, focusing on longitudinal studies and educational equity. The findings underscore the need for continued research to refine the model proposed by this study and adapt it to diverse educational environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.