ArticleHarm reduction journal2025
"It's just what's around these days": social and contextual pragmatism in substance transitions.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe overdose epidemic is presently driven by polydrug use, sparking renewed interest in why people initiate use of certain drugs or drug combinations. Current research privileges the physiological ends of consumption, often ignoring the social and environmental context of use. Framed by social cognitive theory, the purpose of this study was to characterize factors precipitating substance initiation, transition, and combination beyond the immediate effects of the substance(s).
methodsWe conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with people who use drugs across North Carolina, exploring substance use history and risk and protective factors of polydrug use. Participants also completed a visual timeline activity. We used a staged analytic approach, beginning with deductive Structural Coding and ending with inductive Reflexive Thematic Analysis at both the transcript and excerpt levels.
resultsWe conceptualized substance transitions as pragmatic responses to environments of constraints and opportunities. Socially, transitions facilitated interpersonal closeness, aligned use with network norms, and responded to ubiquitous drug availability. Transitions also reflected navigation of material constraints, including which substances were locally available, logistically accessible, and financially sustainable.
conclusionsBeyond the desire for new or enhanced physiological effects, substance transitions serve social and practical functions, like facilitating emotional closeness and responding to market conditions. Interventions to reduce the risks of use should expand viable options by addressing structural barriers and promoting safe, affordable, and accessible supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.