ArticleBMC public health2025
Screens of suffering: how Gaza war news impacts students' minds and motivation.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental health disorders among Sudanese medical students amid the 2023 conflict: prevalence, predictors, and implications.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exam anxiety and associated factors among Palestinian university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ongoing war in Gaza has intensified media coverage of violence and human suffering, which may indirectly affect the psychological well-being and academic engagement of university students. This study investigates how tracking news of the Gaza assault impacts the mental health and academic motivation of Palestinian university students. Specifically, it examines whether depression and anxiety mediate the relationship between media exposure and motivation, identifies overall levels of these variables, and explores demographic influences.
methodsThis sequential mixed-methods study involved Palestinian university students. The qualitative phase included semi-structured Zoom interviews with 15 students to explore their engagement with news about the Gaza assault. Thematic analysis identified key themes used to develop the Tracking Gaza Assault News Scale (TGANS). In the quantitative phase, a cross-sectional survey was administered to 624 students using stratified sampling.
resultsTracking Gaza assault news (TGANS) significantly predicted higher depression and anxiety levels, which in turn negatively affected academic motivation. Both depression (β = - 0.206, p < .05) and anxiety (β = - 0.232, p < .05) mediated the relationship between TGANS and motivation. TGANS also had a direct negative effect on motivation (β = - 0.172, p < .01), with a significant total effect (β = - 0.422, p < .001). Students reported moderate TGANS (M = 3.00), high depression (M = 3.84), low anxiety (M = 2.86), and high motivation (M = 4.08). Females reported higher depression and anxiety than males. Humanities students had higher TGANS, while science students showed greater motivation. Advanced academic years correlated with worse mental health and lower motivation. Students from camps and those bereaved by martyrdom reported higher TGANS, distress, and lower motivation. Watching news for over an hour daily was linked to elevated TGANS and anxiety.
conclusionMedia coverage of the Gaza war constitutes a secondary form of trauma for many Palestinian university students, contributing to deteriorating mental health and academic disengagement. These findings underscore the need for mental health support and resilience-based interventions in university settings during ongoing conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.