ArticleBMC medicine2025
Interpretable and reproducible machine learning model for coronary calcification and segment-level stenoses stratification on computed tomography angiography.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Artery Calcification: From Molecular Mechanisms to Interventional Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Reciprocal cooperative gating fusion of SqueezeNet and ShuffleNetV2 for breast cancer detection in histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is widely used as a first-line tool for diagnosing and managing coronary artery disease (CAD), and machine learning (ML)-based analysis shows promise for quantitative CAD assessment.
methodsIn this post hoc analysis of 909 participants from the SCOT-HEART trial (median follow-up, 5.8 years), we first evaluated the distribution of CCTA-derived imaging features in a cohort (n = 221) with a zero calcium score, stenoses < 10%, and no evidence of CAD on CCTA, across 21 image processing settings. Interpretable ML models were then developed and validated to quantify coronary calcification and stenoses in major coronary segments (LMA, LCX, LAD, pRCA, mRCA). Calcified plaques, stenoses, and myocardial infarction outcomes were comprehensively assessed.
resultsA total of 549 stable imaging features was identified across processing settings. Six ML algorithms (SVM, KNN, MLP, Naïve Bayes, gradient boosting, LightGBM) were evaluated for predicting coronary calcification and stenoses. The best model achieved an accuracy of 84.2% and an AUC of 0.973. Stenosis stratification accuracy exceeded 84.8% across all segments, with minimal (< 0.05) differences between models using all versus stable features. SHAP analysis indicated heterogeneous contributions of imaging phenotypes and clinical risk factors.
conclusionsStable imaging features provide a reference for future ML-based coronary quantitatively assessments. Interpretable ML models demonstrated promising performance in quantifying coronary calcification and segment-level stenoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.