Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299477›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Interpretable and reproducible machine learning model for coronary calcification and segment-level stenoses stratification on computed tomography angiography.

Jian Chen, Hongqiu Wang, Yiran Wei, Yu Xu, Guangming Wang, Yonghao Li, Zeyu Gao, Kaixuan Li, Xiaowei Zhou, Jin Zheng and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jian ChenDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hongqiu WangDepartment of Systems Hub, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China.
Yiran WeiSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Yu XuBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Guangming WangDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yonghao LiDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Zeyu GaoDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kaixuan LiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaowei ZhouDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jin ZhengDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ziming WangDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yuan HuangDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Zhongzhao TengDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
James H F RuddDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lorena Escudero Sánchez *Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. les44@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Michelle C WilliamsBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David E NewbyBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jonathan R Weir-McCall *Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jonathan.weir-mccall@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate CZH/4/588NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre BRC-1215-20014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is widely used as a first-line tool for diagnosing and managing coronary artery disease (CAD), and machine learning (ML)-based analysis shows promise for quantitative CAD assessment.

methodsIn this post hoc analysis of 909 participants from the SCOT-HEART trial (median follow-up, 5.8 years), we first evaluated the distribution of CCTA-derived imaging features in a cohort (n = 221) with a zero calcium score, stenoses < 10%, and no evidence of CAD on CCTA, across 21 image processing settings. Interpretable ML models were then developed and validated to quantify coronary calcification and stenoses in major coronary segments (LMA, LCX, LAD, pRCA, mRCA). Calcified plaques, stenoses, and myocardial infarction outcomes were comprehensively assessed.

resultsA total of 549 stable imaging features was identified across processing settings. Six ML algorithms (SVM, KNN, MLP, Naïve Bayes, gradient boosting, LightGBM) were evaluated for predicting coronary calcification and stenoses. The best model achieved an accuracy of 84.2% and an AUC of 0.973. Stenosis stratification accuracy exceeded 84.8% across all segments, with minimal (< 0.05) differences between models using all versus stable features. SHAP analysis indicated heterogeneous contributions of imaging phenotypes and clinical risk factors.

conclusionsStable imaging features provide a reference for future ML-based coronary quantitatively assessments. Interpretable ML models demonstrated promising performance in quantifying coronary calcification and segment-level stenoses.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisMachine LearningVascular CalcificationAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsCalcification quantificationComputed tomography angiographyInterpretable machine learning modelMajor coronary segmentsStable featureStenoses assessment

Identifiers

PMID41299477
PMCPMC12659364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.