ArticleBMC public health2025
Improving employer and employee well-being in small and medium-sized enterprises in Flanders: a realist evaluation protocol of the FitBonus program.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh levels of absenteeism, presenteeism, and productivity loss are significant issues, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which form a large part of the workforce in Flanders. The FitBonus program, commissioned by the Flemish Government, aims to improve the physical, mental, and social well-being of employers and employees in SMEs. This protocol outlines the methodology for a realist evaluation of the FitBonus program to understand how, why, for whom and under what circumstances the program enhances overall well-being and perceived workability among employers and employees in SMEs in Flanders.
methodsThe evaluation is conducted in three phases: Phase 1 involves developing an Initial Program Theory (IPT) through stakeholder consultations, program documentation review, and literature review. Phase 2 validates the IPT using a mix of quantitative data from online surveys and qualitative data from interviews and focus groups. Phase 3 refines the IPT based on the findings, resulting in a detailed theory and practical recommendations. DISCUSSION: This realist evaluation protocol aims to elucidate the mechanisms and contextual factors influencing the FitBonus program's potential success in improving physical, mental, and social well-being, as well as perceived workability. The insights gained from this evaluation will offer actionable recommendations for optimizing the program's implementation and effectiveness. Additionally, by enhancing the understanding of how well-being interventions work in various organizational contexts, this study can inform the development of future workplace well-being programs, leading to more targeted and effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.