Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299460›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Improving employer and employee well-being in small and medium-sized enterprises in Flanders: a realist evaluation protocol of the FitBonus program.

Fleur Van De Wielle, Robin Vandecasteele, Vera Verbestel, Maïté Verloigne, Benedicte Deforche, Rik Crutzen, Els Clays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fleur Van De Wielle *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium. Fleur.VanDeWielle@UGent.be.
Robin Vandecasteele *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium.
Vera VerbestelDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium.
Rik CrutzenDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Els ClaysDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 4K3, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium.

Funding

Department of Work and Social Economy of the Flemish Government 20221118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh levels of absenteeism, presenteeism, and productivity loss are significant issues, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which form a large part of the workforce in Flanders. The FitBonus program, commissioned by the Flemish Government, aims to improve the physical, mental, and social well-being of employers and employees in SMEs. This protocol outlines the methodology for a realist evaluation of the FitBonus program to understand how, why, for whom and under what circumstances the program enhances overall well-being and perceived workability among employers and employees in SMEs in Flanders.

methodsThe evaluation is conducted in three phases: Phase 1 involves developing an Initial Program Theory (IPT) through stakeholder consultations, program documentation review, and literature review. Phase 2 validates the IPT using a mix of quantitative data from online surveys and qualitative data from interviews and focus groups. Phase 3 refines the IPT based on the findings, resulting in a detailed theory and practical recommendations. DISCUSSION: This realist evaluation protocol aims to elucidate the mechanisms and contextual factors influencing the FitBonus program's potential success in improving physical, mental, and social well-being, as well as perceived workability. The insights gained from this evaluation will offer actionable recommendations for optimizing the program's implementation and effectiveness. Additionally, by enhancing the understanding of how well-being interventions work in various organizational contexts, this study can inform the development of future workplace well-being programs, leading to more targeted and effective interventions.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOccupational HealthSmall BusinessWorkplaceAbsenteeismAdultBelgiumFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleProgram EvaluationCMO-configurationsEmployeesEmployersFitBonus programMixed-methodsRealist evaluationRealist evaluation protocolResearch designSmall and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)Workplace wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41299460
PMCPMC12659514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.