ArticleBMC medical education2025
Early detection of at-risk health sciences students: a machine learning-based predictive study using midterm grades.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of students at academic risk is critical in health sciences education, particularly in regions prioritizing healthcare workforce development. This study evaluated the application of established machine learning (ML) classifiers as a regional case study in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), using first-term midterm performance as early, formative assessment indicators of academic integration and student persistence.
methodsAcademic records from 346 first-year students across seven programs were analyzed. All students were enrolled in three common courses: Biology, English for Medical Sciences, and Introduction to Health Sciences. Five supervised ML models (XGBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and Naïve Bayes) were trained using Random Over-Sampling Examples (ROSE) with five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed with F1-scores and area under the curve (AUC). Interpretability was examined via variable-importance plots and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for XGBoost.
resultsXGBoost and Logistic Regression showed the highest performance (F1 = 0.84; AUC > 0.91). Midterm scores in Biology and Introduction to Health Sciences were consistently the strongest predictors, and SHAP analyses indicated they had the largest case-level impact on risk predictions.
conclusionsFindings demonstrate the feasibility of using midterm grades as early, pedagogically meaningful indicators to identify at-risk students in a UAE health sciences context. While limited in scope to one cohort and institution, the study provides regionally relevant evidence to support timely academic interventions. Future research should include behavioral and psychosocial predictors and validate across multiple cohorts and institutions.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.