ArticleBMC public health2025
Young people's experiences and strategies for improving their awareness and access to mental health and substance use health services.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of digital and E-health literacy on college students' mental health: the chain mediation effect of internet addiction and sleep quality.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Centering Patient Voices: Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment to Address Risky Substance Use in Family Planning Clinics.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundYoung people face persistent challenges in accessing mental health and substance use health (MHSU) services, which have been further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic, and are particularly pronounced among marginalized populations. We sought to understand how young people navigate MHSU services since the pandemic, focusing on their awareness of and access to care.
methodsOur project uses participatory research approaches and is comprised of two phases. This manuscript describes Phase 1, where five young people participated as research partners, informing study design and implementation. We conducted five virtual focus groups with a larger sample of young people from Ontario with MHSU lived experience, prioritizing participants from underrepresented communities. Focus groups explored their service awareness, access experiences, and improvement suggestions. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Phase 2 will involve co-designing resources for young people based on Phase 1 findings.
resultsOur analysis of forty participants identified six interconnected domain themes (relationships and guidance, preferences and choice, convenience, self-directed information seeking, established sources, and system constraints), and fifteen sub-themes, spanning three dimensions of MHSU services (awareness, access, and improvements). We found that young people relied on informal networks (family/friends) and healthcare providers for MHSU service information and access, with trust being essential. They desired both choice in their provider and delivery method, plus the ability to research options independently before making decisions with others. While they primarily got service information from healthcare providers, online platforms, and community organizations, finding comprehensive, reliable information remained challenging. Barriers such as costs, wait times, location, and discrimination highlighted the need for affordable, accessible, and culturally responsive care to meet their diverse needs.
conclusionsThis study revealed key insights about post-pandemic MHSU service awareness and access for young people. Participants demonstrated desires for both autonomy in service selection and guidance from trusted sources, suggesting a supported decision-making model. Recommended service improvements include centralized information resources, stronger informal referral networks, culturally responsive services and flexible delivery options. Partnership with young people throughout the research process yielded valuable perspectives that enhanced study validity. These findings will inform Phase 2-the co-design of resources addressing the information gaps and structural barriers identified by participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.