Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299381›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Indoor residual spraying household visits as a platform for engaging pregnant women in malaria prevention on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea.

David S Galick, Jeremías Nzamío Mba Eyono, Matilde Riloha Rivas, Wonder P Phiri, Carlos A Guerra, Guillermo A García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David S GalickMCD Global Health, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea. dgalick@mcd.org.
Jeremías Nzamío Mba EyonoMCD Global Health, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Matilde Riloha RivasMinistry of Health and Social Welfare, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Wonder P PhiriMCD Global Health, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Carlos A GuerraMCD Global Health, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Guillermo A GarcíaMCD Global Health, Silver Spring, MD, USA. ggarcia@mcd.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women are particularly vulnerable to many health conditions, including infectious diseases, which place them at elevated risk of severe outcomes. In particular, malaria poses a significant burden during pregnancy, and as such there has long been a strong focus on delivering malaria prevention interventions to pregnant women during antenatal care (ANC), including long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp). However, outreach to drive uptake of these interventions presents some distinct challenges. For example, pregnant women may not attend ANC or may not do it in public health facilities, where these interventions are freely available, precluding access. In this study, an implementation of routine annual indoor residual spraying (IRS) on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea was leveraged to identify pregnant women and conduct follow-up visits focused on awareness and uptake of LLINs and IPTp.

methodsIRS campaign data was used to generate lists of households with pregnant women for follow-up visits, during which communication agents conducted an interview based on relevant sections of a malaria indicator survey to assess knowledge about malaria, LLINs and IPTp, and uptake of these interventions. Uptake was defined on an ordinal, three-category scale, and ordinal regression modeling was performed to assess the relationship between uptake and knowledge indicators.

resultsIn total, 1,567 households were visited, and 589 pregnant women identified. There was a high awareness about LLINs (76.9% cited LLINs as a malaria prevention method), but low awareness of IPTp (34.5% could cite any benefit and 37.1% were aware of availability in public health facilities). In line with awareness levels, regular use of LLINs (54.8% reported using every night) was higher than IPTp uptake (35.2% on track for three doses). Ordinal regression modelling confirmed that LLIN use on some or all nights was associated with awareness that LLINs prevent malaria, and IPTp uptake was associated with awareness of the number of doses required.

conclusionsThis work demonstrated that complementary malaria control interventions can be leveraged to identify pregnant women for further outreach. The information collected provides a baseline to evaluate the impact of future activities on Bioko Island and suggests that increasing awareness of IPTp could improve coverage, while further increasing LLIN use will likely require identifying specific barriers to use.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultAntimalarialsEquatorial GuineaFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInsecticidesPregnancyPrenatal CareAntimalarialsInsecticidesAntenatal careIntermittent preventative treatment in pregnancy (IPTp)Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLIN)Malaria preventionProgram integration

Identifiers

PMID41299381
PMCPMC12659551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.