Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299244›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Comparing the predictive power of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for ICU admission in respiratory patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Marzieh Barati Golsheikhi, Zahra Rooddehghan, Maryam Esmaeili, Raoofeh Karimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marzieh Barati GolsheikhiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6262-6519
Zahra RooddehghanSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. zrooddehghan@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2068-9533
Maryam EsmaeiliNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-2270
Raoofeh KarimiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-0202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of clinical deterioration in respiratory patients is essential for timely intervention and ICU admission in emergency departments. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) are widely used and well-established tools for this purpose. However, there is limited comparative evidence regarding their predictive power in respiratory patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the predictive power of NEWS and MEWS for ICU admission in respiratory patients presenting to the emergency departments of four tertiary hospitals in Tehran during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA Multicenter descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using 755 medical records of respiratory patients admitted to the emergency departments of four tertiary hospitals in Tehran (Amir A’lam, Sina, Baharloo, and Shariati) between March 2020 and February 2024. Medical records were selected using a consecutive and convenience sampling method. Data were collected using a demographic information form, the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) form, and the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) form. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 16) and MedCalc (version 3.5.19), employing descriptive and inferential methods.

resultsMedian NEWS and MEWS scores were significantly higher in ICU-admitted patients than in non-ICU patients (P < 0.001). Specifically, the optimal cutoff value for NEWS was determined to be 9, which resulted in a sensitivity of 60.9% and specificity of 82.2%. Similarly, for MEWS, the optimal cutoff point was identified as 6, yielding a sensitivity of 61.4% and specificity of 76.5%. Notably, the AUC for NEWS (0.761; 95% CI: 0.722–0.799) was significantly higher than that for MEWS (0.729; 95% CI: 0.688–0.770; P = 0.002).

conclusionBoth NEWS and MEWS appeared to be effective in predicting ICU admission among respiratory patients. However, NEWS demonstrated slightly superior predictive power. These findings indicate that the integration of NEWS in the emergency triage process may result in early detection of high-risk respiratory patients, leading to improved critical care resource allocation and patient outcomes. Future research is warranted to confirm the generalizability and predictive applicability of NEWS for ICU admission across different clinical contexts. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The code of ethics (IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1403.041) was obtained from the joint ethics committee of the Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery and the Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Confidentiality of patient information and anonymity were also observed throughout the research process. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

COVID-19Modified Early Warning ScoreNational Early Warning ScoreRespiratory patients

Identifiers

PMID41299244
PMCPMC12659561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.