Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299224›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Waiting time ambulances in the Emergency Department; a Dutch single center study (WAITED study).

S Mol, J D G Hageman-van Wamel, M C Van Der Linden, M I Gaakeer, V A De Ridder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S MolEmergency Department, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, Rotterdam, 3045 PM, The Netherlands. s.mol3@franciscus.nl.
J D G Hageman-van WamelEmergency Department, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, Rotterdam, 3045 PM, The Netherlands.
M C Van Der LindenEmergency Department, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, Lijnbaan 32, Den Haag, 2512 VA, The Netherlands.
M I GaakeerAdmiraal de Ruyter Ziekenhuis, Emergency Department, 's-Gravenpolderseweg 114, Goes, 4462 RA, The Netherlands.
V A De RidderUMC Utrecht, Trauma Surgery, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulance offload delay (AOD) indicates the persistent and increasingly visible problem of Emergency Department (ED) crowding. AOD is defined as the extended time from ambulance arrival at the ED until patient care is transferred to ED staff. Despite its negative consequences and international attention, AOD is currently not monitored within the Dutch Emergency Care. It is also unknown whether or not AOD is associated with the ambulance diversion (AD) status. In the Dutch ED the AD status is monitored by means of the traffic light system. This study aims to monitor AOD at the EDs of Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland (FGV).

methodsA 10-week observational study was conducted at both the EDs of FGV. Ambulance personnel was queried regarding AOD duration and traffic light statuses by means of paper questionnaires. Descriptive statistics are reported as frequencies, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Associations between the traffic light status and categorical AOD data were analyzed using Chi-square tests.

resultsDuring the study period, 2967 ambulances arrived at the EDs. In 229 cases (7.7%), the definition of AOD was met. The median AOD was 16 min (IQR: 10-25 min). In 95.6% (n = 2830) of the cases the handover time was less than 15 min. No statistically significant association was found between the traffic light status (green, orange, red) and offload delay categories (p = 0.109). A non-significant difference remained (p = 0.075) when comparing median AOD in the absence of an AD with the median AOD during an (impending) AD.

conclusionThis is the first observational study conducted in the Netherlands collecting data regarding the AOD. The limited observation period, the reliance of self-reported data and the single-center design restricts the generalizability of the data. Consequently, the authors conclude hypothesis-generating findings which warrant validation through planned multicenter research. Nevertheless, besides the existing traffic light system, this unique study provides policy makers with a candidate complementary quality indicator for ED-crowding in the Dutch context.

Indexed as

Ambulance DiversionAmbulance Offload DelayCrowdingEmergency DepartmentEmergency Medical ServicesHospital

Identifiers

PMID41299224
PMCPMC12661773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.