ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025
Elderly Medical Patients' Experience of an Acute Readmission to the Emergency Department-An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesTo explore the experiences of elderly medical patients shortly after an unplanned emergency department readmission and the perceived value of health care encounters.
backgroundElderly medical patients are often frail, have multiple health issues and are at risk for (re)admissions, loss of function, morbidity, and mortality. Elderly people are frequently admitted for a shorter time.
designThis study employed a qualitative design and was conducted at a 700-bed university hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark.
methodsA purposeful sampling included 10 readmitted medical patients over 65 years, admitted for less than 72 h. In-depth qualitative study within the phenomenological-hermeneutical research tradition, drawing analytical inspiration from Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
resultsThe analysis identified three main themes. Patients experience powerlessness and system-dependence in their attempt to navigate the healthcare system and are in need of clarification in relation to the acute readmissions. Patients described being in a life circumstance where they constantly had to balance acute and chronic disease(s).
conclusionsElderly readmitted patients are highly dependent on the randomness of support related to acute healthcare encounters and a supportive network. Lack of health clarification can provoke a negative spiral of disempowerment and lower the threshold for acute health care seeking. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Identifying and understanding the perceived value of a readmission is essential to prevent unplanned readmission and guide healthcare professionals in enhancing the quality of care. REPORTING
methodCOREQ checklist. PATIENTS OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTING: Elderly readmitted patients were involved in the study as participants providing the research data. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: This study illustrates how the organisation and flow culture in the emergency departments are inadequate to meet the multiple health issues of elderly medical patients, where the separation of acute and chronic illness may be blurred. This study describes the experienced consequences of missed care and how patients are having deep trouble connecting value of the acute hospitalisation to their overall health situation, leaving them in a debilitating dilemma in need of clarification. Elderly medical patients exposed to a varying degree of belonging to a personal network may be vulnerable to disempowerment and dependent on a system that does not accommodate their expectations or needs.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Danish ethical committee protocol number: 17006481 and the regional governance AHH no. 2017028-is-suite no. 05367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.