Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299118›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Localizing structure in individual differences: A visual illusion case study.

Mahbod Mehrvarz, Hrithik Popat, Jeffrey N Rouder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahbod MehrvarzDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. mehrvarm@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5426-5867
Hrithik PopatDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Jeffrey N RouderDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2023-3891

Funding

NSF 2126976ONR N00014-23-1-2792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Are people who are susceptible to one illusion also susceptible to others? Previous research has shown small correlations, but might small values reflect attenuation from measurement error from trial-to-trial variation? To assess measurement error, we develop a set of novel data visualizations and hierarchical models. Data from 149 participants on two variants of the five illusions were collected using an adjustment paradigm. The results showed low trial-noise and strong between-subject variability (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio

Indexed as

IllusionsIndividualityOptical IllusionsPattern Recognition, VisualAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultFactor analysisHierarchical modelsIndividual differencesReliabilityVisual illusions

Identifiers

PMID41299118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.