ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Peptide antibody tools to dissect specific functions of eIF4A paralogs in cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) are key regulators of messenger RNA (mRNA) translation, a process highly dysregulated in cancer. Among these paralogs, eIF4A1 and eIF4A2 are closely related DEAD box mRNA helicases that, despite their high sequence identity, play distinct roles in cellular homeostasis and tumorigenesis. In the context of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), where dysregulated protein translation drives tumor progression and metastasis, high rate of relapse, and resistance to radio- and chemotherapy, an understanding of the unique contributions of eukaryotic initiation factor 4 A (eIF4A) paralogs is important. Current commercial antibodies are not validated to claim the specificity towards these helicases. To address this, we developed and validated paralog-specific antibodies to unequivocally detect eIF4A1 and eIF4A2 by leveraging unique sequence differences in their N-terminal regions. Using affinity-purified, rabbit peptide-antibody generation followed by validation through immunoblot analyses of knockout and knockdown cellular lysates, we confirmed the high specificity of the antibodies and the absence of any cross-reactivity. These results establish that these antibodies are invaluable tools for dissecting the distinct roles of eIF4A1 and eIF4A2 in translational control and potential therapeutic strategies targeting these factors to overcome chemoresistance, primary tumor progression, and metastasis. This study provides a foundation for future investigations into the functional divergence of eIF4A paralogs, their functional ramifications in cancer, and their implications in tumor progression and metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.