Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299107›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2025

Systematic analysis of the influence of enzymatic and chemical detergents on structure, biomechanics and biocompatibility of decellularized vascular grafts.

Julian Pfarr, Karina Zitta, Georg Lutter, Sanjay Tiwari, Farhad Haj Mohamad, Philipp Knueppel, Frank Lichte, Katharina Hess, Mark Preuss, Sebastian Debus and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julian PfarrDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Karina ZittaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Georg LutterClinic of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Sanjay TiwariDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Farhad Haj MohamadDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Philipp KnueppelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Kiel University of Applied Science, Kiel, Germany.
Frank LichteAnatomical Institute, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Katharina HessDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Mark PreussClinic of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian DebusClinic of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin AlbrechtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Rouven BerndtClinic of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. r.berndt@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-6235

Funding

Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung Dr Rusche Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to systematically compare standard detergents for the generation of Decellularization Vascular Grafts (DVG) in terms of their influence on vascular key characteristics. The most common enzymatic and chemical detergents for decellularization were identified from literature, standardized and included: i) Trypsin, ii) Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS)- and iii) Triton X-100. All protocols were applied to porcine vessels and the manufactured DVG were analyzed for histological, ultrastructural morphology and biomechanical characteristics. Further, DVG were seeded with Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) and cultured in a bioreactor to investigate biocompatibility after decellularization. Anti-Coagulation properties were assessed by the Chandler Loop model and a platelet-activation-assay. The Trypsin and SDS treatment were the most effective protocols in terms of tissue clearance but both impaired the ultrastructural integrity of the vessel wall in contrast to the Triton X-100 treatment. Moreover, biomechanical characteristics in the test stand did not differ significantly across the applied protocols but treatment of DVG with Trypsin was associated with a reduced Young's modulus and injuries in the vessel wall in a pulsatil flow model after 30 d. Moreover, coagulation was decreased in the Trypsin-treated group and was slightly increased in the SDS group but no significant difference towards the control group was noted. DVG after Triton X-100 treatment were the only ones capable for successful cell seeding. The here presented experimental data emphasized the main advantages and disadvantages of the most common enzymatic and chemical detergents for the manufacturing of DVG.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBlood Vessel ProsthesisDecellularized Extracellular MatrixDetergentsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCells, CulturedHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMaterials TestingOctoxynolSodium Dodecyl SulfateSwineTissue EngineeringTrypsinBiocompatible MaterialsDecellularized Extracellular MatrixDetergentsOctoxynolSodium Dodecyl SulfateTrypsinBioengineeringBypassDecellularizationTissue engineeringVascular graftVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID41299107
PMCPMC12669320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.