Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299104›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Arthroscopic scaphoid reconstruction in non-unions : Aspects for indication, technique, and results].

Steffen Löw, Sebastian Kiesel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steffen LöwPraxis für Handchirurgie und Unfallchirurgie, Ledermarkt 8-10, 97980, Bad Mergentheim, Deutschland. info@handchirurgie-badmergentheim.de.
Sebastian KieselPraxis für Handchirurgie und Unfallchirurgie, Ledermarkt 8-10, 97980, Bad Mergentheim, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArthroscopic reconstruction of the scaphoid is a modern technique for the treatment of scaphoid non-unions. The principle is the arthroscopic resection and filling of the non-union site from the midcarpal joint space. PROCEDURE: Through minimally invasive placement of the scaphoid screw, the critical blood supply of the scaphoid is respected, which achieves high healing rates between 90 and 100%. The use of a cancellous bone graft seems to allow for healing without carpal malalignment, even in the presence of a humpback deformity with extension malposition of the lunate, although an additional transfixation of the wrist should probably be performed. The use of cancellous bone from the distal radius end appears to have an additional healing-promoting effect due to hyperemia of the carpal bones. In the case of problems with the placement of the screw, the use of K‑wires is not detrimental to the healing rate. Particularly small proximal pole fragments can be healed by transfixation of the scapholunate joint using screws or wires. PROGNOSIS: Ultimately, cartilage damage limited to the styloid process of the radius does not constitute a contraindication for reconstruction, provided that it is resected arthroscopically. Even if somewhat poorer clinical outcomes are to be expected, this may potentially avoid a function-compromising salvage procedure.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, UnunitedPlastic Surgery ProceduresScaphoid BoneWrist FracturesBone ScrewsBone TransplantationHumansTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyBone screwsGrafting, boneStandardizationWrist

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.