Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299030›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025

Testosterone replacement therapy following definitive treatment for prostate cancer: a scoping review of safety and efficacy.

John Gibson, Michael George, Peter Grice, Amar Mohee, Theodora Stasinou, Ian Pearce, Vaibhav Modgil, Manchester Andrology Research Collaborative (MARC)

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John GibsonDepartment of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1314-9285
Michael GeorgeDepartment of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-4634
Peter GriceDepartment of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-4233
Amar MoheeDepartment of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Theodora StasinouDepartment of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ian PearceDepartment of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7710-0531
Vaibhav ModgilDepartment of Urology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Vaibhav.Modgil@mft.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1517-6184
Manchester Andrology Research Collaborative (MARC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) remains controversial in men with a history of prostate cancer due to historical concerns regarding oncologic safety. This scoping review aimed to systematically map existing evidence on the safety and efficacy of TRT in men following definitive treatment for prostate cancer. A systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase identified 447 records, from which 12 studies met inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective cohort studies, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 152 men. TRT was not associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence or cancer progression in any included study. Reported PSA kinetics remained within expected post-treatment parameters, and several studies showed lower recurrence rates in TRT groups compared to controls. TRT consistently increased total and/or free testosterone and improved hypogonadal symptoms. However, the evidence base is limited by retrospective designs, small sample sizes, heterogeneous outcome reporting, and a lack of long-term data. Despite these limitations, findings suggest TRT may be cautiously considered in selected men with stable disease and confirmed hypogonadism. High-quality prospective studies are needed to clarify safety in diverse and high-risk populations and inform future clinical guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID41299030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.