ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
In the flow of action: Anticipated action sequences in response-response binding.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In theories of human action, it is assumed that individual actions are nested within higher-order action plans. This hierarchical structure oftentimes allows for the anticipatory planning of multiple future actions even before the current action is fully executed or situational cues demand this specific action. However, much of the existing research on basic action control processes has focused on isolated actions, that is, sequentially planned and executed actions, leaving it unclear whether these findings generalize to more naturalistic, preplanned action contexts. In particular, although the binding of individual responses into common representations and their retrieval from memory have been proposed as key mechanisms supporting action control of action sequences, it remains poorly understood how these processes operate when multiple responses can be planned in advance as part of an action sequence. In this study, we compared action contexts in which individual responses were planned and executed sequentially to contexts in which response sequences allowed for the preplanning of individual responses. Crucially, response-response binding effects of comparable strength were observed in both action contexts. Thus, binding and retrieval of responses seem not only to influence current performance during sequential action planning and execution but also to influence ongoing behavior within action sequences that could be preplanned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.